{"id":588,"date":"2014-01-13T10:33:05","date_gmt":"2014-01-13T09:33:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/?p=588"},"modified":"2014-02-17T00:01:32","modified_gmt":"2014-02-16T23:01:32","slug":"por-que-ensenamos-musica","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/por-que-ensenamos-musica\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00bfPor qu\u00e9 ense\u00f1amos m\u00fasica…?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

\u00abOnly one important and transcendental clarification:<\/p>\n

Unless we are talking about the classical graphical notation system –if it were the modern one it is not even a graphical language, strictly speaking, but kind of a \u00abglossarified idiolectic cryptography\u00bb for each author–, the only point where I must disagree is the third one:\u00a0music is not a foreign language<\/strong>, unless we’re thinking about the kind of sound productions such as extreme atonality –as a nuclear method, not as a resource– and noise because of noise, all of them getting the public to understand nothing. In that case, yes, I would agree that it is a foreign language, but I’m afraid that is not music because of those very reasons<\/p>\n

Music is the same language organ in the brain, well articulated, but devoted to those ineffable aspects of the communication which are based on feelings and emotions and it is an universal competence. Also, the most universalized musical language is tonality, which has a strong natural justification. With thousand of years in its background and natural evolution, tonality is based in an universal system of natural hierarchical order of sounds and structures\u00a0derived from the physical nature of sound –sixteen first more or less audible overtones– and hence tendent to be repeated everywhere, without a previous education, in every primitive human group, as anthropology and neuromusicology are starting to prove and spread and ethnomusicology had postulated long time ago<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Thus, music\u00a0is not<\/strong> a foreign language but, contrarily, our inner natural language to narrate and articulate our own feelings and emotions not communicable by means of speech<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

So, every time we spread the text we are commenting, I would suggest to replace that third point with:<\/p>\n

III.- Music is our natural language to communicate the ineffable.<\/p>\n

Or even, establishing a parallel with what is intended to be communicated in the entire text:<\/p>\n

III.- Music is Language.\u00bb [Agust\u00edn Barahona]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00abOnly one important and transcendental clarification: Unless we are talking about the classical graphical notation system –if it were the modern one it is not even a graphical language, strictly speaking, but kind of a \u00abglossarified idiolectic cryptography\u00bb for each author–, the only point where I must disagree is the third one:\u00a0music is not a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,16,8],"tags":[18,43,30,21],"class_list":["post-588","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-escritos-en-facebook","category-humanismo","category-reflexiones","tag-cultura","tag-filosofia","tag-musica","tag-sensibilidad"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t