{"id":9373,"date":"2023-08-27T19:07:13","date_gmt":"2023-08-27T18:07:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/?p=9373"},"modified":"2023-08-28T15:30:51","modified_gmt":"2023-08-28T14:30:51","slug":"refutando-mitos-atomos-inconscientes-creando-conciencia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/refutando-mitos-atomos-inconscientes-creando-conciencia\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00bf\u00c1TOMOS INERTES GENERAN CONCIENCIA? MITOS Y REALIDADES"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

ESPA\u00d1OL<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>\"\"
\n

\u00abSeg\u00fan un muy utilizado pseudorrazonamiento, el que juntando tres patas carentes de por s\u00ed de equilibrio pueda hacer emerger de repente de ellas un equilibrio que ninguna de las tres por separado pose\u00eda se explicar\u00eda mejor porque hay un elemento inmaterial que hace a las tres patas estables. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pero \u00bfse explicar\u00eda mejor realmente as\u00ed o por una propiedad que necesariamente forma parte del momento en que se constituyen determinados sistemas materiales? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hago la comparaci\u00f3n para que se pueda ver de un modo simple y desnudo la inconsistencia evidente de quienes pretenden insinuar que existe algo inmaterial s\u00f3lo porque no comprenden c\u00f3mo funciona la materia.\u00bb<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Agust\u00edn Barahona]<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

INTRODUCCI\u00d3N<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

El debate sobre si los \u00e1tomos inertes<\/a><\/em> pueden generar conciencia<\/a> resulta apasionante. En este peque\u00f1o art\u00edculo exploraremos un argumento com\u00fan. Vincula esta cuesti\u00f3n con la estabilidad de un tr\u00edpode<\/a>. Analizaremos su validez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PLANTEAMIENTO<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

En primer lugar, se argumenta que los \u00e1tomos al ser inertes<\/em> no pueden generar conciencia. \u00bfQu\u00e9 tan efectivo es este razonamiento? Consideremos una comparaci\u00f3n con las patas de un tr\u00edpode. Estas patas carecen de equilibrio individualmente. Pero \u00bfdepende de un componente inmaterial <\/strong>el que emerja<\/a> equilibrio al unirlas? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

En segundo lugar, esta analog\u00eda resalta la contradicci\u00f3n en la afirmaci\u00f3n de que la conciencia surge de lo inmaterial<\/a>, bas\u00e1ndose en una falta de comprensi\u00f3n de la materia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Adem\u00e1s, esta analog\u00eda simplifica el asunto. La noci\u00f3n de que los \u00e1tomos inertes<\/em> no pueden generar conciencia surge de una visi\u00f3n limitada. Similar a no percibir que la unidad b\u00e1sica de la vida, la c\u00e9lula<\/a>, est\u00e1 compuesta por elementos no-vivos<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finalmente, la generaci\u00f3n de conciencia es un proceso complejo. Involucra interacciones intrincadas de sistemas bioqu\u00edmicos cerebrales. \u00bfEs realmente un obst\u00e1culo insuperable que lo inerte sea inconsciente para este proceso?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CONCLUSI\u00d3N<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

En resumen, el argumento que relaciona lo inerte <\/em>at\u00f3mico con la incapacidad de generar conciencia se fundamenta en una falsa analog\u00eda<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

La comprensi\u00f3n actual de la conciencia involucra diversas disciplinas cient\u00edficas. No puede reducirse a un \u00fanico ejemplo con, como m\u00ednimo, una <\/strong>falacia<\/a> <\/strong>incorporada. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

La exploraci\u00f3n de la relaci\u00f3n entre la materia y la conciencia sigue siendo un tema en constante evoluci\u00f3n que requiere un an\u00e1lisis meticuloso desde m\u00faltiples perspectivas cient\u00edficas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consiguientemente, explorar esta tem\u00e1tica implica profundizar en investigaciones actuales en neurociencia<\/strong> y f\u00edsica cu\u00e1ntica<\/strong>. Ofrecen perspectivas fascinantes sobre la interconexi\u00f3n materia\/mente<\/em>.\u00bb<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Agust\u00edn Barahona]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

ENGLISH<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>\"\"
\n

\u00abAccording to a frequently used pseudo-argument, the idea that by combining three legs that lack balance on their own, an equilibrium that none of the three possessed individually suddenly emerges, could be better explained by the presence of an immaterial element that stabilizes the three legs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But would it actually be better explained this way, or by a property that necessarily becomes part of the moment when certain material systems are constituted?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I draw this comparison so that the evident inconsistency of those who insinuate the existence of something immaterial solely because they don’t understand how matter works can be seen in a simple and bare manner.\u00bb<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Agust\u00edn Barahona]<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

INTRODUCTION<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\u00abThe debate about whether inert<\/a> atoms can generate consciousness<\/a> is captivating. In this short article, we will explore a common argument that links this question to the stability of a tripod<\/a>. We will analyze its validity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PROPOSITION<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Firstly, it is argued that inert atoms cannot generate consciousness because of their inert nature. How effective is this reasoning? Let’s consider a comparison with the legs of a tripod. These legs lack balance individually. But does the emergence<\/a> of balance when they are brought together depend on an non-material<\/a> component?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Secondly, this analogy highlights the contradiction in the assertion that consciousness arises from the immaterial, based on a lack of understanding of matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, this analogy simplifies the issue. The notion that inert atoms cannot generate consciousness arises from a limited perspective, similar to not recognizing that the basic unit of life, the cell, is composed of non-living elements<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lastly, the generation of consciousness is a complex process involving intricate interactions of brain biochemical systems. Is the inertness of matter truly an insurmountable obstacle to this process?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CONCLUSION<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In summary, the argument connecting atomic inertness to the incapacity to generate consciousness is grounded in a false analogy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The current understanding of consciousness involves various scientific disciplines. It cannot be reduced to a single example with, at the very least, an embedded fallacy<\/a> <\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The exploration of the relationship between matter and consciousness remains a continually evolving topic that requires meticulous analysis from multiple scientific perspectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consequently, delving into this theme implies delving into ongoing research in neuroscience and quantum physics. These fields offer fascinating insights into the interconnectedness of matter and mind.\u00bb<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Agust\u00edn Barahona]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00bf\u00c1tomos inertes generan conciencia? Analizamos si \u00ablo interte\u00bb limita esto. Exploramos analog\u00edas y complejidades en la interacci\u00f3n materia-conciencia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[34,9,8],"tags":[36,65],"class_list":["post-9373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ciencia","category-escritos-en-facebook","category-reflexiones","tag-ciencia-2","tag-educacion"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9373"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9373\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9398,"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9373\/revisions\/9398"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agustinbarahona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}